PEOPLE
JEWS AND PASHTUNS
BY: NASSER YOUSAF
Something really uncanny appears to have given an impetus to the discussion surrounding the genealogy of the Pashtuns, particularly the myths tracing the trail to one of the lost tribes of Jews.
In what could be called as a new to this rather trite topic, video clips on social media are being posted to give credence to the unfounded theory that Pashtuns indeed are the descendants of the Jewish tribes.
In these videos, some Jewish men and women could be seen excitedly dwelling on various similarities between the Pashtuns and Jews and calling that as proof enough of the two being one and the same people.
Such puerile arguments are undoubtedly laughable and ought not to be taken seriously. But one may ask why this persistent interest in tracing the genealogy of the Pashtuns only and not of any other people?
Could this be something in humour or some serious attempt to douse the fired-up emotions of the Pashtun militants up in arms on the world circuit?
On the genealogical grounds, adding more to the subject from the old chronicles would certainly be at the risk of indulging in unwanted plagiarism. But two points from Olaf Caroe's 'The Pathans' would merit mention.
For instance, it has long been argued that one of the ten Jewish tribes that did not join the Exodus into Judea went to Mecca. A sizable number of Jews from this tribe took a different route and resettled in Ghor (the present-day Hazarajat), in Afghanistan. The much talked about Jewish-Pashtun lineage is said to be rooted here.
This is simply preposterous, as also argued by Caroe who believed that conversion among the Jews was unknown and they had let themselves be marked out for not forsaking their faith. The Jews who settled in Ghor, if they ever really did, could not thus be expected to have forsaken their faith to embrace Islam.
The myth around Ghor was spun and fostered to the liking of people like Syed Jabbar of Kohat, a friend of Olaf Caroe. Jabbar couldn't bring himself to appreciate the idea of being the offspring of the Polytheistic Aryans.
Jews as monotheistic and believing in the same God were more presentable as forefathers than the Aryans, Caroe thought.
The timing of the Jewish proposition and its threadbare dissection by the British during their rule in the Frontier is also pretty interesting. There certainly was more to the subject being discussed with such zest than met the eye.
Za heraan yam pa de khalqu na puegam
Thagi mri walaar thar halqa pa darya ke
(When I look at these people they bewilder me;
They are dying of thirst while standing in the river up to their necks.
Khushal Khan Khattak)
There is hardly anything that escaped the imagination of the 17th century Pashtun warrior-poet Khushal Khan Khattak. His voluminous poetry even prescribes cures for various ailments. He was Pashtun nationalism personified.
Same was the case with the 17th century Pashtun poet Rahman Baba. While Rahman Baba remained grounded to his soil in a little known village, Khushal spent his life traveling and fighting the Mughal rulers of India.
Both these great Pashtun chroniclers in verse knew the world from Adam down to their own times, and in fact far ahead of their times. But there is absolutely no suggestion in their works that says anything of the Pashtuns being the children of the Jews.
Those wishing to find a non-existent connect between the turban and the kippah (Jewish skull cap), need go nowhere but scan the works of Khushal and Rahman.
posted by Nasser Yousaf @ 00:08 2 Comments
2 Comments:
Nicely addressed. Rahman Baba and KKK would have known. Also implies that this Jewish link is post 17th century invention.
To my mind, Afghans are an Aryan tribe that refused to submit to Achaemenid Empire. I also know that Waziris and Mehsud occupied the fertile Bannu valley but were pushed out by the then more militant Bannuchi tribes. It's the fastness of the hills that gives tribesmen their character. Same tribesmen, san their guns, line up to the humiliation of a beduin in UAE or SA.
Good topic
Parvez
Dear Nasser Yousaf Sahib,thanks for sharing your delightful take on Pashtuns and Jews. You sum up the debate through the wisdom of the two 17th century literary giants, Khushal Baba and Rahman Baba. Your note is apt because it cautions against believing in theories without reference to evidence. You warn against riding wishes like wild horses . Romance is a part and parcel of life but cannot be accepted as gospel. Even gospels have to face scrutiny in our hard-nosed times.
Yet in my view, we need to approach the above issue academically. There there have been huge movements of people’s in history. There has been extensive as well as intensive research on the movement of Aryan tribes from Bactria over millennia, the rise of Semitic and Hamitic peoples, and their interactions and divergences in this entire region. Contemporary research involves historical, ethnic and linguistic analysis in order to form hypothesis in this fascinating field. If you have the time and disposition, could you delve into the work done by professional ethnologists and social historians from relevant global institutes; maybe google can present information about the latest state of research. It would be foolish to believe even that research off-hand, but what is the harm of bringing to the table results to date from those professional institutes.
While I appreciate your take on the subject, the state of art in this field needs to be summed up for common readers like me. Without that aspect considered, it would be difficult to pass a final judgment on such subjects. You may or may not agree to my line of thinking, and I have great respect for your opinions.
Always in our prayers and our thoughts. Sincerely. Ejaz Rahim
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home